Title: What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815-1848 (Oxford History of the United States) Purchase Item Manufacturer: Oxford University Press, USA List Price: $35.00 Our Price: $16.00
Customer Reviews:
What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815-1848 (Oxford History of the United States) by Oxford University Press, USA A tremendous undertaking and done very well
This addition to the Oxford History of the United States is truly a masterpiece covering the era of the new republic. The book begins in the aftermath of the War of 1812 and tracks the political, social, economic and cultural development of the United States through the Seneca Falls Convention and beginning of the Gold Rush. The book explores the rise of evangelicalism in the United States through the great awakening and looks at the rise of the city which organized many natavist movements. The role of slavery and the treatment of Indians is also explored in a responsible way. Although some reviewers have complained that it is revisionist there is quite a bit of truth to Howe's writing. The organizers at the time wrote about "the extermination of the Indians" and we cannot change out countries past. We can only study it and interpret what it means for our future. The United States came into its own during this time laying the seeds to become an economic powerhouse. The rise of the telegraph, railroads, canals and industry across the country shaped the United States for its rise in the 1880's. The book is divided up amongst the major events during the time period and covers them thoroughly. The two major focus points of the book are the Jacksonian era and the age of expansion under Polk. Jackson is painted in a darker light than in many books have written about him. The author justifies his points well and his criticisms of Jackson are on target. The destruction of the bank and the spread of populism and patronage changed the United States. The Age of Expansion was another defining moment as the United State added Texas, Oregon and the southwest to its borders. Although Polk wanted to go even further he was sabotaged by his own representatives into drawing a reasonable peace with Mexico. Overall a well done book and truly a great addition to this already wonderful series.
What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815-1848 (Oxford History of the United States) by Oxford University Press, USA Jacksonian Racism
Can you imagine a U.S. president who forces the country into an unpopular war, and when some members of Congress express doubt, he calls them unpatriotic? Hard to believe, right? Okay, maybe not. How about a president who never doubts he is right and never apologizes when he is wrong? Who ignores the Constitution and the Supreme Court? Impossible, right? Okay, okay, so it isn't. I'm not referring to our current president, but to two who served long ago. They are James K. Polk and Andrew Jackson, and the two are central figures in Daniel Walker Howe's WHAT HATH GOD WROUGHT. It is a magnificent book--magnificent in its detailed research, magnificent in its lively prose, and magnificent in its wide scope. It covers the period from the Battle of New Orleans in January of 1815 to the presidential election of 1848, and everything in between. Jackson, Polk, and Martin Van Buren are the villains of the book. As Howe convincingly shows, their primary agenda was to spread slavery and white supremacy across the continent. Jackson ignored the Supreme Court's decision which said that the Cherokee had title to their land. He ignored the Constitution, which said that a president could not remove funds from the National Bank. He owned slaves and supported the spread of slavery west. He showed himself to be a stubborn, narrow-minded man. Why is he considered a great president? Why does his image remain on the twenty dollar bill? Howe points out the irony of this, as Jackson was against the use of paper money, and he personally destroyed the Second U.S. Bank, which sent the country into a lengthy depression. Polk forced a war on Mexico, then tried to blame it on them. The war was fought solely to gain land, and many Americans were embarrassed at our imperialism and our racism. Many still are. There are those who come off very well in the book-- Abraham Lincoln, Henry Clay, and Brigham Young among them. John Quincy Adams seems especially worthy of the greatness stamp. He fought for women's rights and for the rights of Native Americans to keep their traditional lands. He was a ferocious opponent of slavery, and opposed the Mexican War. Adams, it seems, was way ahead of his time. It would be much more just if he were on the twenty dollar bill, rather than Jackson. But for true justice, we should replace Jackson with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. That would show we've come full circle. I think Quincy Adams would approve.
What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815-1848 (Oxford History of the United States) by Oxford University Press, USA Read Like a Novel
I enjoyed this book immensely, reading it cover-to-cover like a novel. For those who tend to think that America went from Revolution to Civil War without much happening in between, it's a real eye-opener. I already shared Howe's respect for Henry Clay and John Q. Adams, and his seeming dislike of Andrew Jackson, based on the little I knew of them. After reading "WHGW", I respect my instincts, and understand them much better.
What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815-1848 (Oxford History of the United States) by Oxford University Press, USA An articulate, scholarly, well-rounded period US history work highly readable for the lay person and with relevance for today
Being retired and with a particular interest in this period of US history (for reasons disclosed below), I possessed both adequate time and motivation to undertake the reading of this voluminous work, hoping that it wouldn't bog down into a pedantic recitation by page 200. Far beyond my most optimistic expectations, it turned out to be a real "page turner", not like one of those Grisham novels, but rather a work that kept opening my eyes to what the reality of this country was back then, and how that past still bears witness to what we are experiencing today. It is nothing less than astonishing for the author to attempt and succeed in combining so many disciplines of knowledge into such a lucid, comprehensive portrayal of what our forefathers did, recorded, and left as a legacy for us today. As a lay reader with great interest in, but only a relatively superficial understanding of what went on during the 1815-1848 period, the book offeres innumerous facts and subsequent interpretations by the author, as footnoted and sourced from hundreds of secondary, scholarly works. This academic format, however, never slowed down my understanding of and appreciation for what was going on. If one has some interest in our Presidents of that period (i.e. Madison, Monroe, Adams, Jackson, Van Buren, Harrison, Tyler and Polk) the narrative covers most of them in detail and offers many startling (at least to this lay person) revelations which, in hindsight, has me scratching my head as to why certain of these gentlemen have such a high positive profile today. Mr. Howe definitely has his biases in appreciation of these men, but supports his interpretations with scholarly attention to factual details about their personalities, politics, and policies. Andrew Jackson, the well-coiffured fellow we see on the face of the $20 bill at every ATM visit, and who we know as the military hero of the Battle of New Orleans during the War of 1812, comes off as a protector of the union, but otherwise a rather bullying, temper prone imperialist, and with few exceptions, having little concern or care for the well being of any but the caucasian male race. As Mr. Howe points out, the supreme irony of his continued appearance on the $20 dollar bill, despite being both against an independent national bank (i.e. akin to today's federal reserve bank) and the use of paper money, is something one can only sit back and be befuddled by (the reasoning for this decision made by our government back in 1928 is not available for public scrutiny). The view towards John Quincy Adams - the curmudgeonly old man portrayed so well by Anthony Hopkins in Steven Spielberg's Amistad movie - is much more positive and forgiving, as Howe details his rather enlightened approach (for that day) to social classes other than the white male, economic development using federal funds, and foreign policy. Finally, the portrayal of James K. Polk as the scheming, secretive President who plotted and waged an aggressive war on Mexico during 1846-48 while all the time keeping Congress off stride with his manipulations, surely brings to mind both the thinking behind and execution of today's war in Iraq by Messrs. Bush and Cheney. Substitute "soil" for "oil" and you pretty much understand what was going on then and now. Knowing that the inspiration for the book's title and its central figure representative of the themed importance of communications and transportation in the progress of our nation at that time was Samuel F.B. Morse (also a noted historical artist and leader of the arts community of that period), I was hoping that the contribution of visual arts to this period would be recognized, at least in some ancillary way. However, despite including a well chosen series of reproduced portraits and genre paintings, prints and sculpture representative of personalities and events of this period, the text itself completely ignores the topic. While some attention is paid to music, the theatre, and literature of the time, in particular in relation to ties to slavery and its themes, apparently the visual arts represented too "highbrow" of a topic for inclusion. As I see it though, there could have been - especially as part of the chapters on the "New Economy" and/or "American Renaissance" - an effort to tie in the seemingly disparate, but actually connected topics of the deity/millenialism, nature, transcendentalism, urbanism, book and serial illustrations, the first original american school of landscape painting (later dubbed the Hudson River School), and the beginnings of travel and tourism by the emerging middle class of the period. As there were many strong ties between writers and artists during this time, this would not have been a difficult thing to do, and because of its absence, I can only give a four star rating to the book. Notwithstanding, if you have a few weeks of leisure time to devote to understanding in detail how we evolved into what we have become as a nation, I can't think of a more productive use of ones time. Thanks Dr. Howe for your wonderful contribution.
What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815-1848 (Oxford History of the United States) by Oxford University Press, USA What hath Howe wrought?
The latest volume of the Oxford History of the United States is What Hath God Wrought which covers 1815-1848. The series is overall outstanding, McPherson's Battle Cry of Freedom is one of the volumes and likely the most well known. Each are great general histories which not only use primary sources but comment on the changes in the given era's interpretation by historians. The bibliographies are worth the price of book. If I were to teach U.S. history I'd use these in lieu of a traditional text book (which are generally poor). However, this latest volume is striking in the amount of editorializing going on. Granted I'm an Andrew Jackson fan so am sensitive to criticism but here's an example: In attempting to show that AJ's 1828 presidential victory was sectional and southern he recounts that Jackson won 178 to 83 in the Electoral college but the election would have gone to Adams had electoral votes been apportioned without use of the 3/5 rule for slaves. Fine, that is likely true. But what he fails to explain is how Jackson won the popular vote 647,286 (56%) to 508,064 (44%). 3/5 effects representation and electoral votes, not popular votes. Think about that- in essentially condemning the 3/5 rule the author has made the case for it- had it not existed Adams would have been elected despite an overwhelming popular vote against him. Does the author then take the old Federalist perspective that the people cannot be trusted and thus the EC's job to correct them? The author further fails to point out in this section (but does so later in a single sentence) that Jackson tired to abolish the EC in favor of a straight popular election for president. It would seem to me this is quite fitting for an era where differing view of nationalism had completely buried all Federalist opposition. Also note that in 1824 AJ won the popular vote (41%) and had the most EC votes (99) but since there was no majority winner the election went to the house and to Adams. In 1832 AJ again won the popular vote w/ 56%. Also, Howe seems to use the (to me) charged statement "white supremacy" with great frequency in regards to Indian removal. The implication of this phrase to my mind is that the motivation was based on race. In my readings I feel that this is a simple, modern and unrealistic interpretation. I believe that Jackson would have been adamant (and was) about removal of ANY threat to U.S. expansion, be it Indian, Spanish, English, free blacks or martians. The drive to expand more than racism was the primary motivation for removal. Jackson hated any who stood in the way of U.S. expansion- his earlier actions in Florida against the Spanish and English are proof of this. Howe claims Jackosn was an Anglophoe and thus a hypocrite when he later treats with them. Again, Jackson was much more a Nationalist and would do anything to further U.S. interest as he saw it, even compromising other of his beliefs which were not as high a priority. It seems like the author is not a fan of Jackson personally and thus is overly critical of him to the point of bias as noted by the above examples. I am surprised this made it past the series editor. In fact I found the volumes which cover the most recent U.S. eras- Grand Expectations (1945-1974) Restless Giant (1974-2000) to be very even handed in their analysis. Which actually surprised me in that more recent history tends to be more divisive to me as a reader since I lived through some of it and therefore have an ingrained point of view, have not had enough time to see its effects and thus am more skeptical and likely to disagree with any analysis. This volume's other sections are on par with the rest of the series but Howe seems to have a personal affinity for Adams (as did George Dangerfield and historians before him), a person I suspect Howe sees as a kindred spirit and fellow intellectual. Howe seems to nurse a deep dislike for Jackson, the "man's man" as Howe puts it. Almost as if the historian sees Jackson as one of his own childhood tormentors- a tough guy with no philosophical basis for his actions. I had high hopes for this volume after reading that Howe rejected the conclusions of both Charles Sellers's The Market Revolution (which argued that market capitalism was forced on the people from the top down) and The Jacksonian Era by Schlesinger (which was a very far left leaning interpretation). Despite that, however, Howe's main thesis of a communication & transportation revolution which facilitated ideas of nationalism was intriguing. Would be nice to see this idea explored in a smaller more focused work.
What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815-1848 (Oxford History of the United States) by Oxford University Press, USA Product Description
The Oxford History of the United States is by far the most respected multi-volume history of our nation. The series includes three Pulitzer Prize winners, a New York Times bestseller, and winners of the Bancroft and Parkman Prizes. Now, in What Hath God Wrought, historian Daniel Walker Howe illuminates the period from the battle of New Orleans to the end of the Mexican-American War, an era when the United States expanded to the Pacific and won control over the richest part of the North American continent. Howe's panoramic narrative portrays revolutionary improvements in transportation and communications that accelerated the extension of the American empire. Railroads, canals, newspapers, and the telegraph dramatically lowered travel times and spurred the spread of information. These innovations prompted the emergence of mass political parties and stimulated America's economic development from an overwhelmingly rural country to a diversified economy in which commerce and industry took their place alongside agriculture. In his story, the author weaves together political and military events with social, economic, and cultural history. He examines the rise of Andrew Jackson and his Democratic party, but contends that John Quincy Adams and other Whigs--advocates of public education and economic integration, defenders of the rights of Indians, women, and African-Americans--were the true prophets of America's future. He reveals the power of religion to shape many aspects of American life during this period, including slavery and antislavery, women's rights and other reform movements, politics, education, and literature. Howe's story of American expansion culminates in the bitterly controversial but brilliantly executed war waged against Mexico to gain California and Texas for the United States. By 1848 America had been transformed. What Hath God Wrought provides a monumental narrative of this formative period in United States history.

Evening at Adler Video Now Online drunkenblog: “On October 21st in the year of '05, ten top Mac developers (primarily indies) from around the USA were invited to the Adler Planetarium in Chicago, IL for an evening of conversation around a broad range of topics: Making a living writing for the Mac, software patents, competing with Apple, digital rights management (DRM), software activation, bugs, Ajax, unit testing, building communities, the x86 transition, and much much more... This was recorded, and the video and audio are now online.” Tue, 15 Nov 2005 04:03:09 GMT

For Whatever Reasons Daring Fireball: For Whatever Reasons: “USA Today technology columnist Kevin Maney complained last week about having been hit hard by a Windows virus on his home computer: ‘My computer was only 18 months old. I wasn’t totally naïve...’” Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:57:45 GMT